Beyond the Prescriptive: Unlocking the Power of CFD for UNI/TS 9494-4
For years, the design of Smoke and Heat Exhaust Ventilation Systems (SHEVS) was largely a game of tables, rigid formulas, and prescriptive limits. If your building was a standard box, the standard rules worked fine.
But modern architecture rarely sticks to “standard boxes.”
From soaring atria to complex shopping malls and underground hubs, today’s structures demand a fire safety approach that is as dynamic as the architecture itself. Enter UNI/TS 9494-4—the Italian technical specification that opens the door to performance-based design, with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) as its master key.
The Shift from Part 1 & 2 to Part 4
To understand the value of Part 4, we must look at its predecessors.
- UNI 9494-1 & -2 provide the “prescriptive” methods. They are excellent for standard industrial configurations or simple geometries. They tell you exactly how many vents you need based on fixed parameters.
- UNI/TS 9494-4 is the “engineering” method. It allows designers to validate proper smoke control in complex scenarios where standard formulas fail.
The core philosophy of Part 4 is not about meeting a static number of vents, but about proving that the environment remains tenable for human evacuation.
What is CFD in this Context?
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is essentially a “virtual wind tunnel.” In the context of fire safety, it uses numerical analysis to solve the fundamental equations of fluid flow (Navier-Stokes equations) regarding the movement of smoke and heat.
Instead of guessing how smoke will fill a complex dome, CFD simulates it over time, second by second.
Why UNI/TS 9494-4 Needs CFD
When applying the engineering methods of UNI/TS 9494-4, you are generally trying to prove one critical inequality:
ASET > RSET
- ASET (Available Safe Egress Time): How long conditions remain safe (visibility, temperature, toxicity).
- RSET (Required Safe Egress Time): How long it takes people to recognize the alarm and evacuate.
You cannot calculate ASET accurately in a complex building using a calculator. You need CFD to visualize the “smoke layer” interface. CFD allows you to determine:
- Visibility: Will evacuees be able to see exit signs 10 minutes into the fire?
- Temperature: Will the heat flux at head-height remain bearable?
- Smoke Movement: Will smoke bypass a curtain or get trapped in a specific architectural pocket?
The Benefits of Simulation-Based Design
Adopting the UNI/TS 9494-4 approach via CFD offers significant advantages:
- Architectural Freedom: Architects can design high ceilings, irregular shapes, and open-plan spaces without being constrained by rigid vent spacing rules.
- Cost Optimization: Often, prescriptive rules force over-dimensioning. CFD might reveal that you need fewer mechanical fans if they are positioned strategically, saving capital and maintenance costs.
- Make-up Air Verification: One of the most common failures in smoke control is the lack of inlet air. CFD visualizes exactly how fresh air enters the building and interacts with the smoke plume.
The Workflow: From Fire to Report
If you are commissioning or performing a UNI/TS 9494-4 analysis, here is what the workflow generally looks like:
| Stage | Activity |
| 1. Define the Scenario | Establish the “Design Fire” (HRR – Heat Release Rate), fire growth rate (alpha), and soot yield. |
| 2. Geometry & Mesh | Create a 3D model of the building and divide it into millions of tiny cells (the mesh). |
| 3. Processing | The solver runs the simulation (often taking days for complex models). |
| 4. Analysis | Post-processing results to check visibility (e.g., maintaining >10m visibility) and temperature (e.g., <60°C in the smoke-free layer). |
A Note of Caution
CFD is a powerful tool, but it is not magic. The UNI/TS 9494-4 standard places high demands on the competency of the user. “Garbage in, garbage out” applies heavily here. Incorrect mesh sensitivity, wrong boundary conditions (like wind pressure), or unrealistic fire curves can lead to dangerous conclusions.
Conclusion
UNI/TS 9494-4 represents the maturation of fire safety engineering in Italy. By leveraging CFD, we move from simply “following the code” to genuinely understanding the physics of fire in our specific building. This ensures that when the alarm sounds, the system performs exactly as intended—keeping the smoke up, the air clear, and the people safe.
Would you like me to generate a checklist of the specific data inputs required (HRR, geometry, etc.) to start a UNI/TS 9494-4 simulation?
CloudHPC is a HPC provider to run engineering simulations on the cloud. CloudHPC provides from 1 to 224 vCPUs for each process in several configuration of HPC infrastructure - both multi-thread and multi-core. Current software ranges includes several CAE, CFD, FEA, FEM software among which OpenFOAM, FDS, Blender and several others.
New users benefit of a FREE trial of 300 vCPU/Hours to be used on the platform in order to test the platform, all each features and verify if it is suitable for their needs
