Navigating Smoke with FDS: A Deep Dive into CEN TS 12101 CFD Analysis for Horizontal Extraction

Introduction

In the realm of fire safety engineering, effective smoke control is paramount to saving lives and protecting property. While natural smoke ventilation has its place, situations often demand active systems, such as horizontal smoke extraction. The challenge then lies in designing and validating these systems. This is where computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, specifically the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), comes into play, guided by standards like CEN TS 12101.

This post will delve into the process of using FDS for analyzing horizontal smoke extraction systems in accordance with CEN TS 12101, focusing on the critical aspects and considerations involved.

CEN TS 12101: The Foundation for Smoke Control Design

CEN TS 12101 is a European Technical Specification that provides guidance on the design, installation, and maintenance of smoke and heat control systems (SHEVs). While not a mandatory standard, it serves as a valuable reference, particularly for specifying performance criteria, testing methods, and system performance. It outlines key parameters like:

• Design Fire: Defining the size, location, and growth characteristics of the fire.
• Required Smoke Layer Height: Ensuring a smoke-free zone below a specified height for safe egress.
• Required Extraction Rates: Determining the necessary airflow to maintain the smoke layer height.
• Performance Criteria: Defining acceptable limits for visibility, temperature, and other relevant factors.

Why FDS for Horizontal Smoke Extraction Analysis?

FDS is a powerful, open-source CFD software developed by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). It’s specifically designed for simulating fire dynamics, making it ideal for analyzing smoke propagation and extraction systems. FDS offers several advantages:

• Realistic Fire Modeling: It uses a finite volume method to solve the Navier-Stokes equations, coupled with combustion and radiation models, allowing for accurate representation of fire behavior.
• Detailed Smoke Visualization: FDS provides detailed visualizations of smoke movement, temperature distribution, and other critical parameters.
• Flexibility: It allows users to model complex geometries, varying fire scenarios, and a wide range of system configurations.
• Validation and Verification: FDS has undergone rigorous validation against experimental data, providing confidence in its results.

The Process: Modeling Horizontal Smoke Extraction in FDS

Here’s a breakdown of the key steps involved in conducting a CEN TS 12101 analysis using FDS for horizontal smoke extraction:

1. Geometry Creation:
   • Accurately model the building or space under consideration, including structural elements, openings, and the location of the fire and extraction points.
   • Ensure sufficient grid resolution around critical areas (fire source, extraction grilles, etc.) for accurate results.
   • Consider the impact of obstacles and potential flow disturbances.
2. Fire Source Definition:
   • Define the heat release rate (HRR) based on the design fire scenario from CEN TS 12101 or project-specific requirements.
   • Specify the fuel type and combustion characteristics.
   • Define the fire location, size, and shape.
3. Extraction System Modeling:
   • Model the extraction grilles, ducts, and fans accurately.
   • Define the fan performance curves (flow rate vs. pressure).
   • Account for any pressure losses within the system.
   • Consider the placement of extraction grilles to optimize smoke removal.
4. Boundary Conditions:
   • Define appropriate boundary conditions for the domain, such as ambient temperature, pressure, and any incoming airflow.
   • Consider the impact of natural ventilation and wind effects if necessary.
5. Simulation Execution:
   • Run the FDS simulation until a steady-state or a defined simulation time is reached.
   • Monitor the simulation progress to ensure stability and convergence.
6. Post-Processing and Analysis:
   • Analyze the simulation results, focusing on critical parameters such as:
     • Smoke Layer Height: Compare the achieved smoke layer height with the required height specified in CEN TS 12101.
     • Temperature Distribution: Ensure temperatures remain below acceptable limits, especially in escape routes.
     • Visibility: Assess visibility levels to ensure safe egress.
     • Extraction Flow Rates: Verify that the extraction system is operating as designed and achieving the required flow rates.
     • Smoke Velocity: Evaluate the velocity of the smoke layer to assess the potential for smoke logging.
7. Verification and Validation:
   • Compare the simulation results against relevant fire safety engineering principles and experimental data (if available).
   • Document all assumptions, modeling choices, and results.
   • If results do not meet the required criteria, iterate on the design and simulation to achieve the desired performance.

Key Considerations and Challenges

• Computational Resources: FDS simulations can be computationally intensive, requiring powerful hardware and sufficient simulation time.
• Grid Sensitivity: Ensure proper grid resolution to capture the important flow features. Perform grid sensitivity studies to assess the impact of the mesh size on the results.
• Model Simplifications: Recognize that FDS models are simplifications of reality. Account for any limitations and uncertainties.
• Interpretation of Results: The output of FDS simulations must be interpreted carefully by a qualified professional, as they require a thorough understanding of the underlying physics.

Conclusion

FDS is a valuable tool for analyzing the effectiveness of horizontal smoke extraction systems, providing engineers with the necessary information to design and validate systems that meet the requirements of CEN TS 12101. By following a systematic approach, carefully defining the fire scenario, and thoroughly analyzing the results, engineers can leverage the power of CFD to ensure the safety of buildings and their occupants. This approach can help optimise system performance while minimising costs and risks associated with fire incidents.

Call to Action

Do you have experience with FDS simulations for smoke control? Share your insights and experiences in the comments below! Let’s continue the conversation on improving fire safety engineering practices.

---

CloudHPC is a HPC provider to run engineering simulations on the cloud. CloudHPC provides from 1 to 224 vCPUs for each process in several configuration of HPC infrastructure - both multi-thread and multi-core. Current software ranges includes several CAE, CFD, FEA, FEM software among which OpenFOAM, FDS, Blender and several others.

New users benefit of a FREE trial of 300 vCPU/Hours to be used on the platform in order to test the platform, all each features and verify if it is suitable for their needs

---

Contact Name/Surname *

Company Name *

Company address *

City *

State/Province *

Country *CountryArubaAfghanistanAngolaAnguillaÅland IslandsAlbaniaAndorraUnited Arab EmiratesArgentinaArmeniaAmerican SamoaAntarcticaFrench Southern TerritoriesAntigua and BarbudaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBurundiBelgiumBeninBonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaBurkina FasoBangladeshBulgariaBahrainBahamasBosnia and HerzegovinaSaint BarthélemyBelarusBelizeBermudaBolivia, Plurinational State ofBrazilBarbadosBrunei DarussalamBhutanBouvet IslandBotswanaCentral African RepublicCanadaCocos (Keeling) IslandsSwitzerlandChileChinaCôte d'IvoireCameroonCongo, The Democratic Republic of theCongoCook IslandsColombiaComorosCabo VerdeCosta RicaCubaCuraçaoChristmas IslandCayman IslandsCyprusCzechiaGermanyDjiboutiDominicaDenmarkDominican RepublicAlgeriaEcuadorEgyptEritreaWestern SaharaSpainEstoniaEthiopiaFinlandFijiFalkland Islands (Malvinas)FranceFaroe IslandsMicronesia, Federated States ofGabonUnited KingdomGeorgiaGuernseyGhanaGibraltarGuineaGuadeloupeGambiaGuinea-BissauEquatorial GuineaGreeceGrenadaGreenlandGuatemalaFrench GuianaGuamGuyanaHong KongHeard Island and McDonald IslandsHondurasCroatiaHaitiHungaryIndonesiaIsle of ManIndiaBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryIrelandIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIcelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJerseyJordanJapanKazakhstanKenyaKyrgyzstanCambodiaKiribatiSaint Kitts and NevisKorea, Republic ofKuwaitLao People's Democratic RepublicLebanonLiberiaLibyaSaint LuciaLiechtensteinSri LankaLesothoLithuaniaLuxembourgLatviaMacaoSaint Martin (French part)MoroccoMonacoMoldova, Republic ofMadagascarMaldivesMexicoMarshall IslandsNorth MacedoniaMaliMaltaMyanmarMontenegroMongoliaNorthern Mariana IslandsMozambiqueMauritaniaMontserratMartiniqueMauritiusMalawiMalaysiaMayotteNamibiaNew CaledoniaNigerNorfolk IslandNigeriaNicaraguaNiueNetherlandsNorwayNepalNauruNew ZealandOmanPakistanPanamaPitcairnPeruPhilippinesPalauPapua New GuineaPolandPuerto RicoKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofPortugalParaguayPalestine, State ofFrench PolynesiaQatarRéunionRomaniaRussian FederationRwandaSaudi ArabiaSudanSenegalSingaporeSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSaint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da CunhaSvalbard and Jan MayenSolomon IslandsSierra LeoneEl SalvadorSan MarinoSomaliaSaint Pierre and MiquelonSerbiaSouth SudanSao Tome and PrincipeSurinameSlovakiaSloveniaSwedenEswatiniSint Maarten (Dutch part)SeychellesSyrian Arab RepublicTurks and Caicos IslandsChadTogoThailandTajikistanTokelauTurkmenistanTimor-LesteTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTürkiyeTuvaluTaiwan, Province of ChinaTanzania, United Republic ofUgandaUkraineUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUnited StatesUzbekistanHoly See (Vatican City State)Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofVirgin Islands, BritishVirgin Islands, U.S.Viet NamVanuatuWallis and FutunaSamoaYemenSouth AfricaZambiaZimbabwe

Email *

Email

Confirm Email

Privacy *

• I accept the privacy conditions

Privacy Policy

Phone

Send registration